Human-technology relations in an age of surveillance capitalism: Towards an anthropological theory of the dialectic between analogue and digital humanity
Parole chiave:Digitalisation, digital anthropology, subjectivity, humanity, Cambridge Analytica
What can anthropology contribute to the current debates about the negative effects of social media on people? Starting from a critique of anthropological work that sees human subjectivity and culture as ontologically unaffected by social media use, I propose that human engagement with these digital technologies produces significant ontological transformations that deserve more attention. I develop my analysis in dialogue with Boellstorff’s ontology of the digital, Nardi’s theorisation of virtuality and affordances, and Zuboff’s formulation of surveillance capitalism, and I use empirical illustrations from the Cambridge Analytica data scandal to highlight key theoretical junctures. My main contribution is an outline of an anthropological theory of the dialectic between what I call analogue humanity and digital humanity. The two are mutually constituted but ontologically distinct. In the current political economy of digitalisation, tech companies are driving a process of increasing substitution of analogue humanity and forms of life with digital ones, as part of their quest for accurate prediction and social engineering of all aspects of human behaviour. While an anti-technology stance is neither practicable nor desirable, anthropologists need to think about how analogue humanity can be preserved and nurtured so that it can avoid ontological extinction.
Aouragh M. 2018, Digital anthropology, in Callan H. (ed.) 2018, The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bateman T. 2021, Facebook whistleblower: four key takeaways from Frances Haugen’s US Senate hearing, «Euronews», October 6.
Besteman C., Gusterson H., (eds.) 2019, Life by algorithms: how roboprocesses are remaking our world, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boellstorff T. 2008, Coming of age in Second Life: an anthropologist explores the virtually human, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Boellstorff T. 2016, For whom the ontology turns: theorizing the digital real, «Current Anthropology», 57 (4): 387-407.
Boellstorff T. 2021, Rethinking digital anthropology, in Geismar H., Knox H. (eds.) 2021, Digital anthropology, 2nd ed., London: Routledge, 44-62.
Boellstorff T., Maurer B. (eds.) 2015, Data, now bigger and better!, Prickly Paradigm Press.
Cadwalladr C., Graham-Harrison E. 2018, Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach, «Guardian», March 17.
González R.J. 2017, Hacking the citizenry? Personality profiling, ‘big data’ and the election of Donald Trump, «Anthropology Today», 33 (3): 9-12.
Costa E. 2016, Social media in southeast Turkey, London: UCL Press.
Dang S., Dave P., 2021, Facebook research shows company knew of Instagram harm to teens, senators say, «Reuters», October 1.
Graeber D. 2009, Direct action: an ethnography, Edinburgh: AK Press.
Green S. et al. 2016, Brexit referendum: first reactions from anthropology, «Social Anthropology», 24 (4): 478-502.
Gusterson H. 2017, From Brexit to Trump: anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism, «American Ethnologist», 44 (2): 209-214.
------ 2019. Introduction. In: Besteman C., Gusterson H. (eds.) 2019, Life by algorithms, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1-27.
Hann C. 2019, Anthropology and populism, «Anthropology Today», 35 (1): 1-2.
Henare A., Holbraad M., Wastell S. 2007, Introduction: thinking through things, in Henare A., Holbraad M. Wastell S. (eds.) 2007, Thinking through things: theorizing artefacts ethnographically, New York: Routledge, 1-31.
Hayles N.K. 1999, How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Haynes N. 2016, Social media in northern Chile, London: UCL Press.
Heywood P. 2017, The Ontological Turn, in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology, https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/ontological-turn.
Ingold T. 2009, Anthropology is not ethnography, «Proceedings of the British Academy», 154.
Kaiser B. 2019, Targeted: my inside story of Cambridge Analytica and how Trump and Facebook broke democracy, London: HarperCollins Publishers.
Kavanagh C. 2018, Why (almost) everything reported about the Cambridge Analytica Facebook ‘hacking’ controversy is wrong, «Medium», March 25.
Keith M. 2021, Facebook’s internal research found its Instagram platform contributes to eating disorders and suicidal thoughts in teenage girls, whistleblower says, «Business Insider», October 4.
Kosinski M., Stillwell D., Graepel T. 2013, Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior, «Proc Natl Acad Sci USA», 110 (15): 5802–5805.
Laterza V. 2012, Innocence of Muslims: how fiction creates reality, «Al Jazeera English», September 19.
------ 2016, Democracy after Sanders: building a progressive alternative, beyond social media and mass rallies, «openDemocracy», May 26.
------ 2018, Cambridge Analytica, independent research and the national interest, «Anthropology Today», 34 (3): 1-2.
------ 2021, Could Cambridge Analytica have delivered Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential victory? An anthropologist’s look at big data and political campaigning, «Public Anthropologist», 3 (1): 119-147.
Laterza V., Römer L.P. 2020, With the support of the left, Biden can deliver progressive gains, «Al Jazeera English», November 21.
Lynch G., Willis J., Cheeseman N. 2018, Claims about Cambridge Analytica’s role in Africa should be taken with a pinch of salt, «The Conversation», March 23.
Mac R., Kang C. 2021, Whistle-blower says Facebook ‘chooses profits over safety’, «New York Times», October 27.
Mackay A., Tatham S. 2011, Behavioural conflict: why understanding people and their motivations will prove decisive in future conflict, Books Express Publishing.
Mackintosh E. 2021, Facebook knew it was being used to incite violence in Ethiopia. It did little to stop the spread, documents show, «CNN», October 25.
Matz S.C., Kosinski M., Nave G., Stillwell D.J. 2017, Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion, «Proc Natl Acad Sci USA», 114 (48): 12714–12719.
Mazzarella W. 2019, The anthropology of populism: beyond the liberal settlement, «Annual Review of Anthropology», 48: 45-60.
McDonald T. 2016, Social media in rural China, London: UCL Press.
Miller D. 2016, Social media in an English village, London: UCL Press.
Miller D. et al. 2016, How the world changed social media, London: UCL Press.
Miller D., Horst H.A. 2021, Six principles for digital anthropology, in Geismar H., Knox H. (eds.) 2021, Digital anthropology, 2nd ed., London: Routledge, 21-43.
Mitroff I.I., Storesund R. 2020, Techlash: the future of the socially responsible tech organization. Cham: Springer.
Nardi B. 2010, My life as a night elf priest: an anthropological account of World of Warcraft, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Nardi B. 2015, Virtuality, «Annual Review of Anthropology», 44: 15-31.
Nicolescu R. 2016, Social media in southeast Italy, London: UCL Press.
O’Sullivan D., Duffy C., Jorgensen S. 2021, Instagram promoted pages glorifying eating disorders to teen accounts, «CNN», October 4.
Postill J. 2021, Digital politics, in Geismar H., Knox H. (eds.) 2021, Digital anthropology, 2nd ed., London: Routledge, 159-177.
Robins-Early N. 2021, How Facebook is stoking a civil war in Ethiopia, «Vice», November 8.
Rosa J., Bonilla Y. 2017, Deprovincializing Trump, decolonizing diversity, and unsettling anthropology, «American Ethnologist», 44 (2): 201-208.
Seaver N. 2017, Algorithms as culture: some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems, «Big Data & Society», 4 (2): 1-12.
------ 2018, What should an anthropology of algorithms do?, «Cultural Anthropology», 33 (3): 375-385.
Sinanan, J. 2017, Social media in Trinidad, London: UCL Press.
Spyer J. 2017, Social media in emergent Brazil, London: UCL Press.
Sumpter D. 2018, Outnumbered: from Facebook and Google to fake news and filter-bubbles - The algorithms that control our lives, London: Bloomsbury.
Tatham S., Le Page R. 2014, NATO strategic communication: more to be done?, Riga: National Defence Academy of Latvia.
Turkle S. 2011, Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other, New York: Basic Books.
------ 2015, Reclaiming conversation: the power of talk in a digital age, New York: Penguin Press.
Venkatraman S. 2017, Social media in south India, London: UCL Press.
Wang X. 2016, Social media in industrial China, London: UCL Press.
Wells G., Horwitz J., Seetharaman D. 2021, Facebook knows Instagram is toxic for teen girls, company documents show, «Wall Street Journal», September 14.
Wylie C. 2019, Mindf*ck: Cambridge Analytica and the plot to break America, New York: Random House.
Zuboff S. 2019, The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power, London: Profile Books.
Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons - Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l'opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
Gli autori possono diffondere la loro opera online (es. in repository istituzionali o nel loro sito web) prima e durante il processo di submission, poiché può portare a scambi produttivi e aumentare le citazioni dell'opera pubblicata (Vedi The Effect of Open Access).